Main menu:

Mina böcker

Sök på sidan

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Länkar

November 2013
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

Kategorier

Bertrand Russell om ateism och agnosticism

I never know whether I should say “Agnostic” or whether I should say “Atheist”. It is a very difficult question and I daresay that some of you have been troubled by it. As a philosopher, if I were speaking to a purely philosophic audience I should say that I ought to describe myself as an Agnostic, because I do not think that there is a conclusive argument by which one prove that there is not a God.
On the other hand, if I am to convey the right impression to the ordinary man in the street I think I ought to say that I am an Atheist, because when I say that I cannot prove that there is not a God, I ought to add equally that I cannot prove that there are not the Homeric gods.
None of us would seriously consider the possibility that all the gods of homer really exist, and yet if you were to set to work to give a logical demonstration that Zeus, Hera, Poseidon, and the rest of them did not exist you would find it an awful job. You could not get such proof.
Therefore, in regard to the Olympic gods, speaking to a purely philosophical audience, I would say that I am an Agnostic. But speaking popularly, I think that all of us would say in regard to those gods that we were Atheists. In regard to the Christian God, I should, I think, take exactly the same line.

From “Am I An Atheist Or An Agnostic?
A Plea For Tolerance In The Face Of New Dogmas”
by Bertrand Russell (1947)
Bookmark and Share

Skriv en kommentar